The very treatment prescribed by the Medical Establishment to “fight” cancer actually allows cancer to grow and thrive.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the developed world, and yet we are still in the dark ages when it comes to treating and understanding it.
The colossal failure of conventional cancer treatments reflects an inability of the Medical Establishment to understand what cancer – the “enemy” – actually is.
Now it appears that most Cancer Treatment Speeds Death of the patient and may actually encourage the spread of Cancer.
Both chemotherapy and radiotherapy are by their very nature carcinogenic (cancer causing) treatments. The only justification for their use, in fact, is that they are highly effective at damaging the DNA within cells – with the hope that the cancer cells will be more likely to be harmed than the healthy ones (sadly, this is not always true). This I call the “hope” approach – the doctors are hoping they can kill more cancer cells than healthy ones so you don’t die. You have better odds playing roulette in a rigged casino.
The reality, however, is that the “collateral damage” from these treatments is inevitable; it is not a matter of “if,” but to what degree the damaging side effects will occur. As in real modern warfare, the decision to strike is often based on deciding how much collateral damage to “civilian” populations is deemed acceptable. This is not unlike the fixation in toxicological risk (risk of causing death) assessments for drugs, environmental pollutants, food additives, etc., where determining “an acceptable level of harm” (a terrible contradiction for Doctors to even consider) to the consumers is the first (and sometimes only) consideration when releasing a product. i.e. They ask themselves the question; “If we release this product will we make more money than we are forced to pay out to lawyers or the family of those we kill?”
If you were diagnosed with Cancer where would you put yourself on a scale of 1 to 10 for an “acceptable level of harm”? 1 is Do No Harm (as per the Hippocratic oath sworn by some, but not all Doctors), and 10 being “kill me now and get it over with”.
Chemo Agent Classified by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as Carcinogenic
The DNA-damaging effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, according to the present experts, are the #1 cause of cancer initiation and promotion. This is known as the “Mutational Theory” of cancer, and has been the dominant explanation for half a century.
It makes no sense that the standard of care in cancer treatment today is still the use of DNA-damaging agents versus substances that are able to selectively harm the “bad” cells, leaving the “good” ones intact. This treatment is known as “selective cytotoxicity,” and is a property characteristic of natural anti-cancer compounds and whole plant extracts. The problem is that these natural anti-cancer compounds are not able to be patented by Pharmaceutical companies, which allows them to extract maximum revenue from dying patients and their families. Greed trumps empathy.
Take the cancer drug tamoxifen, for example. It is classified by the World Health Organization and the American Cancer Society as a human carcinogen, and has been documented to cause over two dozen health-destroying side effects, and yet it is still being used as a first line treatment for certain types of breast cancer. Does that really make sense?
You need to understand that over 50% of all money extracted from Cancer patients occur in the last 30 days of their lives.
Radiation Therapy Known To Cause Cancer & Enhance Malignancy
Similarly, radiotherapy is known to induce secondary cancers, along with a wide range of serious adverse effects. A woman whose breast is irradiated is more likely to develop lung cancer, for instance.
Radiotherapy has been shown to increase the survival and self-renewing capacity of these breast cancer initiating cells by up to 30 times, which means that while a radiation treatment may initially reduce a tumor’s volume/mass, it may actually be actively selecting out the more radiation-resistant and aggressive sub-population of tumor cells which eventually leads to the faster spread of the cancer.
This increasing of self-initiating cancer cells is also true for chemotherapy, of course.
Incidentally, the low-dose radiation used to diagnose breast cancers in x-ray mammography is likely causing far more cancers in women over time than it is said to prevent. If you read the actual peer-reviewed medical literature on the subject you may be surprised to find that the low-dose ionizing radiation is actually far more carcinogenic (3-4 times higher) than the high-dose radiation it is often compared to in radiation risk assessments.
In fact, one of the most well known breast cancer associated genes, namely, BRCA1/BRCA2, confers greater susceptibility to radiation induced breast cancer in those who have it. In other words, staying away from medical radiation, diagnostic or therapeutic, may be essential to avoid the cancer it is being used to both “prevent” and “treat.”
Treatment kills healthy cells
The chemotherapy and radiation, therefore, actually kill the very cells that do not represent a threat, and select for more invasive ones.
This explains why at first the introduction of chemotherapy/radiation may cause tumor size reduction, but the small population that survives (including cancer stem cells) comes back even stronger after the treatment. Sure it takes some time to become noticeable, but they are multiplying all the time as the healthy cells that kept them in check are now all dead.
Chemotherapy and radiation CREATE a genetically more resistant population of super-cancers, and often is the reason why the patient dies. Sadly, in these cases the death is blamed on the “chemo-resistant” and “radio-resistant” cancer. The victim’s family is told that without the treatment they received they would have died sooner, while in reality that was unlikely to be the case.
Can you see, then, how radiotherapy and chemotherapy may be responsible for driving a cancer into a frenzy of unlimited reproduction, at the very moment that it is harming the rest of the body, compromising the immune system (damage to the bone marrow and direct harm to the immune cells)?
Standard operating procedures is to write off the patients death as being “caused” by an “exceptionally aggressive” form of cancer, rather than to admit that the cancer treatments may have transformed a relatively slow growing tumor into a rapidly growing and invasive one.
Given the likelihood that the conventional cancer industry is often not only failing to improve the quality and length of the lives of those who it treats, but quite the opposite, reducing the quality and length of their lives, the time has come to look for safe, effective, affordable, inexpensive and accessible alternatives to patented chemicals and ionizing radiation in the prevention and treatment of cancer.
If you are diagnosed with Cancer, there are always two options.
1. Do nothing, eat better and enjoy your families and friends more; or
2. Allow Doctors and the Medical Establishment to strip you of your Health, Dignity and Money and kill you quicker than the original Cancer would have.
Get more articles on Cancer by signing up below.